Of course, the two siblings still look confusingly similar at the start – the differences are hidden in the details. Big Blue has now begun merging parts of Symphony into OpenOffice, including the side panel user interface component, which makes its OO debut in the latest release.Ībout three years have passed since the spinoff, and clear differences now exist between OpenOffice and LibreOffice. IBM, which outfits and maintains millions of corporate desktops, recognized a need to maintain some control of over the evolution the OpenOffice, and to avoid doubling their efforts, they even stopped working on their own Lotus Symphony suite to focus on OpenOffice. Since that time, IBM has taken the lead on OpenOffice development. Oracle eventually decided not to continue the OpenOffice project and handed over the source code to the Apache Software Foundation in 2011. They quickly published the first version, although this was only rebadging, simply to demonstrate that the project was alive. They formed the Document Foundation and developed what was the current version of OpenOffice at the time, under the name LibreOffice. This uncertainty about continued support prompted some leading developers to create a fork of the project in September 2010. The new owner of OpenOffice did not support the project as fully as Sun and kept its future development under wraps. Sun Microsystems sponsored the project and ensured its continuous development, and OpenOffice remained in calm waters until Sun was acquired by Oracle in 2010.
Finally, Linux had a complete FOSS office suite that also suited professional requirements. In May 2002, the first version of appeared.
0 kommentar(er)
